1. To know the physics of ionising radiation and their interaction with matter 2. To acquire knowledge, skills and a conscious autonomy of judgement about ionizing radiation and their effects on biological tissues. 3. To know the role of dental radiology in particular to know the role of dentalscan CT and orthopantomography 4. To be able to reason according to the specific logic of the radiological discipline

Basic knowledge of dental anatomy and physiopatolgy

1. Introduction 2. X ray physical principles. 3. Interaction between X ray and matter 4. Radiobiology 5. Radioprotection 6. Ultrasound 7. Computer Tomography 8. CT Dentascan Orthopantomography

CITTADINI G. : Manuale di Radiologia Clinica – Ed. ECIG

1. Introduction 2. X ray: phisics elements. 3. Interaction between X ray and matter 4. Radiobiology 5. Radioprotection 6. Ultrasound 7. Computer Tomography 8. CT Dentascan/ Orthopantomography

frontal teaching

none

Evaluation consists in an oral examination: open questions to evaluate the knowledge and ability to reason of the student. Profit assessment may take into account the results achieved in any verification tests or interviews sustained during the course. The score of the exam is awarded by a grade expressed in thirtieth. To pass the exam (18/30) the student must demonstrate that he/she has acquired and understood the basics knowledge covered in the course. To achieve the maximum score (30/30 and laude) the student must demonstrate that he has acquired an excellent knowledge of all the topics covered during the course. In the case of a vote of 30/30 a maximum of one point may be awarded for obtaining praise. The evaluation grid adopted is as follows: - Excellent (30 - 30 and praise): the student shows excellent knowledge of arguments, excellent language properties, excellent analytical ability; the student is able to brilliantly apply theoretical knowledge to. concrete cases. - Very good (27 - 29): the student shows good knowledge of subjects, remarkable language properties, good analytical ability; the student is able to correctly apply theoretical knowledge to concrete cases. - Good (24-26): the student shows good knowledge of the major topics, discrete language properties; the student shows a adequate ability to apply theoretical knowledge to concrete cases. - Satisfactory (21-23): the student does not show full mastery of the main subjects of teaching, while possessing the knowledge fundamental; it nevertheless shows satisfactory properties of language and. sufficient ability to apply theoretical knowledge to concrete cases. - Sufficient (18-20): the student shows minimal knowledge of main subjects of teaching and technical language, limited ability to adequately apply theoretical knowledge to cases concrete. - Insufficient: the student does not have an acceptable knowledge of the contents of the different topics of the programme.

This course explores topics closely related to one or more goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (SDGs)